Stampfer and The Catharsis of King Lear Essay -- King Lear essays

Stampfer and The Catharsis of queen Lear At the end of poof Lear, when the only characters remaining standing are Albany, Edgar, and Kent, is the audience supposed to come away from the be given with any feeling other than remorse? This search for emotional incommode by the audience is one which J. Stampfer believes is the most profound problem in King Lear. The overriding particular problem in King Lear is that of its ending. The dyings of Learand Cordelia submit us like a raw, fresh wound where our every sense c whollys forhealing and reconciliation. This problem, moreover, is as much one of philosophicorder as of dramatic effect. In what sort of universe, we ask ourselves, can wastefuldeath follow suffering and torture? In his essay The Catharsis of King Lear, Stampfer discusses sevearal readings of Lears death, proves them faulty, and, through analyzation of this and other Shakespearian texts, arrives at his own conclusion concerning Lears denouement and the audiences r eaction. The essay begins with Stampfer defining the relevancy of Lears death to King Lear and the essay reader. Stampfer does not waste the time of the reader with an elaborate introduction. Instead, the offset printing line defines the problem The overriding critical problem in King Lear is that of its ending (361). Still in the first paragraph, he quotes the line from Lear that causes the interpretation problems, referring to it as Lears desparing question (361) wherefore should a dog, a horse, a rat have life,And thou no breath at both? (v,iii, 306-7) The rest of the paragraph discusses problems which, in Stampfers opinion, cannot be pushed aside, such as the source Shakespeare used to write King Lear, and the Christian referenc... ...ld, and abandons athiesm and attempts to save Lear and Cordelia. This creates a paradox for Stampfer if characters such as Lear, Gloucester, and Edmund all go through nigh sort of awakening, why do they all die? Is there any justice in the u niverse? Stampfer examines Othello, Hamlet, and Romeo & Juliet, and concludes that in each of those tragedies, the play ends with the reconciliation of the tragic hero and society (371). Lear, in Stampfers opinion, is the first tragedy in which the tragic hero dies unreconciled and indifferent to society (371). So Stampfer finds it necessary to go over the biz of Lear again, and dervie what within the structure makes Lear different from the before mentioned plays, and attempt to find some sort of catharsis. Stampfer comes up with several key points. The first is Lears apostasy of everything he once knew.