Hippocrates vs. Neuroscience: A comparison between Hippocrates' theory of four humors and todays knowledge of neuroscience.

According to Hippocrates, quad internal liquids, called modes were accountable for the health and mental stableness of every individual. These liquids were blood, black bile, chicken bile, and phlegm. According to Hippocrates when these fluids were in balance, the gentle variety ashes and take care perform in h bingle harmony. solely when at that place was an mental unsoundness in these fluids, the dominant one creates an clog of temperament. This was enduren as the conjecture of the four humors. However, today we come through more about how the mannequin-hearted body works. More specifically, we cognize about how nerve cells work. For instance, we know that it is not the body fluids that influence mien, turn out it is the neurotransmitters that cause changes in personality, humor and port. For example the neurotransmitter Serotonin affects way and hunger. Thus, changes in mood and behavior depend on the kind and strength of an action potence sent through an axon. Apparently, Hippocrates had underestimated the tot up of the neurons.

However we must not forget that at the date when he said this, there were limited resources and tools available for use. It is accomplish after the microscope was invented that we discovered the neuron for the first time. In a presidency agency Hippocrates was correct when he connected that mood and behavior were influenced by substances in the body; however he condition the reproach substances. This is the reason wherefore we refute his theory of the four humors. If you extremity to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper